In a resounding display of unity, the Australian public has spoken loud and clear with a resounding “NO” vote on the recent referendum. The message is crystal clear. The referendum, which sought to implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart – Voice, Treaty, and Truth, has been met with strong opposition by the majority of Australians. However, the state of S.A. has raised eyebrows around the country by its Premier Peter Malinauskas’s decision to legislate a state-based implementation of the Uluru Statement. “South Australians have voted clearly against a Voice to Parliament and it’s now up to Peter Malinauskas to explain where to from here,” SA Opposition Leader David Speirs said.
The SA Voice will not have any powers to veto legislation or stop Parliament undertaking its duties and functions. But it can engage with the South Australian Government, including Cabinet, Cabinet Ministers, and Chief Executives of government departments.
The question on everyone’s mind is, “Are they serious, and are they going against the clear vote of the Australian people?”
The referendum was put forward with the noble intention of addressing Indigenous constitutional recognition, representation, and reconciliation. However, despite the good intentions, the proposal faced a fierce backlash. The resounding NO vote reflects widespread concerns about the proposed changes, such as fears of unintended consequences, a lack of public engagement, and skepticism regarding its practical implementation.
Premier Peter Malinauskas’s decision to push forward with a state-based implementation in South Australia has raised concerns about democratic representation. The people of Australia have made their stance clear, and the majority have voted against the referendum. While it is essential to address the concerns of the Indigenous communities and strive for reconciliation, the decision to legislate against the vote sends a concerning message about the weight of public opinion in the political process.
Every state, apart from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), had a majority vote of NO. This comprehensive rejection highlights the nationwide apprehension surrounding the proposed changes. The people have expressed their concerns, and it is vital that their voices are heard and respected.
The divide between South Australia’s state-based implementation and the rest of the country’s rejection of the referendum brings into question the idea of national unity. Australia, as a nation, has always been known for its diverse and inclusive society. In this context, it’s imperative that the government respects the collective decision of the people and seeks to find alternative ways to address the issues raised by the referendum.
The people have voted. The “No means No” message must be acknowledged, and the government should work towards a solution that is representative of all Australians.
Name and address supplied